Best- and worst-run cities in California

- WalletHub rank: #149 of 149
- Quality of city services rank: 12
- Financial stability rank: 49
- Education rank: 12
- Health rank: 2
- Safety rank: 65
- Economy rank: 92
- Infrastructure and pollution rank: 16

- WalletHub rank: #143 of 149
- Quality of city services rank: 76
- Financial stability rank: 65
- Education rank: 60
- Health rank: 6
- Safety rank: 126
- Economy rank: 131
- Infrastructure and pollution rank: 97

- WalletHub rank: #133 of 149
- Quality of city services rank: 87
- Financial stability rank: 126
- Education rank: 57
- Health rank: 47
- Safety rank: 55
- Economy rank: 16
- Infrastructure and pollution rank: 145

- WalletHub rank: #129 of 149
- Quality of city services rank: 75
- Financial stability rank: 130
- Education rank: 32
- Health rank: 16
- Safety rank: 48
- Economy rank: 122
- Infrastructure and pollution rank: 120

- WalletHub rank: #128 of 149
- Quality of city services rank: 59
- Financial stability rank: 96
- Education rank: 85
- Health rank: 21
- Safety rank: 53
- Economy rank: 119
- Infrastructure and pollution rank: 87

- WalletHub rank: #121 of 149
- Quality of city services rank: 139
- Financial stability rank: 140
- Education rank: 120
- Health rank: 88
- Safety rank: 115
- Economy rank: 107
- Infrastructure and pollution rank: 147

- WalletHub rank: #120 of 149
- Quality of city services rank: 92
- Financial stability rank: 117
- Education rank: 76
- Health rank: 55
- Safety rank: 79
- Economy rank: 97
- Infrastructure and pollution rank: 103

- WalletHub rank: #118 of 149
- Quality of city services rank: 113
- Financial stability rank: 113
- Education rank: 70
- Health rank: 81
- Safety rank: 86
- Economy rank: 99
- Infrastructure and pollution rank: 137

- WalletHub rank: #116 of 149
- Quality of city services rank: 103
- Financial stability rank: 121
- Education rank: 107
- Health rank: 95
- Safety rank: 63
- Economy rank: 74
- Infrastructure and pollution rank: 100

- WalletHub rank: #110 of 149
- Quality of city services rank: 122
- Financial stability rank: 109
- Education rank: 80
- Health rank: 105
- Safety rank: 81
- Economy rank: 96
- Infrastructure and pollution rank: 149

- WalletHub rank: #104 of 149
- Quality of city services rank: 17
- Financial stability rank: 57
- Education rank: 23
- Health rank: 1
- Safety rank: 40
- Economy rank: 61
- Infrastructure and pollution rank: 121

- WalletHub rank: #99 of 149
- Quality of city services rank: 68
- Financial stability rank: 139
- Education rank: 44
- Health rank: 8
- Safety rank: 38
- Economy rank: 57
- Infrastructure and pollution rank: 124

- WalletHub rank: #78 of 149
- Quality of city services rank: 2
- Financial stability rank: 122
- Education rank: 1
- Health rank: 9
- Safety rank: 27
- Economy rank: 19
- Infrastructure and pollution rank: 104

- WalletHub rank: #71 of 149
- Quality of city services rank: 48
- Financial stability rank: 88
- Education rank: 82
- Health rank: 10
- Safety rank: 39
- Economy rank: 53
- Infrastructure and pollution rank: 129

- WalletHub rank: #56 of 149
- Quality of city services rank: 7
- Financial stability rank: 86
- Education rank: 8
- Health rank: 7
- Safety rank: 25
- Economy rank: 39
- Infrastructure and pollution rank: 41

- WalletHub rank: #21 of 149
- Quality of city services rank: 1
- Financial stability rank: 62
- Education rank: 2
- Health rank: 11
- Safety rank: 15
- Economy rank: 26
- Infrastructure and pollution rank: 66
This story features data reporting and writing by Elena Cox and is part of a series utilizing data automation across 19 states.