Counties in California where landslides pose the greatest threat
In California, over half of the land is susceptible to landslides in 44 counties. In 9 counties, over 90% of land is susceptible.
A landslide occurs when rock, debris, or earth moves down a slope. Inclines like hills and bluffs are a critical element of slides, meaning mountainous regions are at higher risk. Typically, landslides are triggered by forces like heavy rainfall, snowmelt, earthquakes, volcanic activity, human activities, or some combination of factors. Often, they're impossible to predict.
According to the Geological Survey, places where weak or fractured earth sit on steep slopes are likely to experience landslides—for example, areas with a history of strip mining. In Appalachia, about 1,400 square miles of land are scarred by strip mining within the Ohio River basin, according to an Inside Climate News analysis of satellite imagery. Together, the "waste rock" left behind, increasing stream flows, and heavy rainfalls brought on by climate change create a deadly recipe for landslides. This part of Appalachia is also near the Gulf of Mexico, where fast-warming waters stir up exceptionally fast-growing storms, as was the case with Hurricane Helene.
Combined, these elements create the highest vulnerability to landslides in the region. Much of West Virginia, in particular, is at risk: In 47 of the state's 55 counties, more than 90% of the land is susceptible to slides. Parts of Virginia, Kentucky, Ohio, Tennessee, and North Carolina are also exceedingly vulnerable.
Parts of California's coastline have also been plagued by major landslides. Earlier this year, a rockslide destroyed a part of Highway 1 along the state's famed Big Sur. The earth below the highway isn't sturdy, and wetter storms are further weakening it, contributing to more frequent and severe landslides. The majestic Big Sur stretch is an iconic road trip and tourism destination, where the highway winds along cliffs above the Pacific Ocean. However, it was forced to close to most traffic, and still offers just one lane at some points.
Other landslide risk factors include population growth, rapid land use changes, urbanization, heavy logging and deforestation, and inappropriate use of lands—slopes in particular. Wildfires also generate landslide hazards, leaving behind excess debris that can be dragged down during floods, as was the case in Big Sur.
The heightened frequency and severity of landslides are a direct consequence of logging, mining, and climate change, with massive repercussions for safety and critical infrastructure in the U.S. and around the world.
Hazard maps like those from the Geological Survey are a tool that federal, state, and local governments can use to identify landslide vulnerabilities and prepare for them. Preparation and mitigation efforts might include landslide drills, evacuation plans, improved drainage systems, and slope stabilization. Governments in susceptible areas can adopt disaster-resilient building codes and standards, as well as restrictions on mining and logging.
In some cases, such as Highway 1, there are no obvious solutions to fully protect against landslides. Still, with increased awareness and response plans, people can make more informed decisions on where to live (or safely visit) and can prepare themselves for landslides and their aftermath.
Read on to see where in California is most vulnerable to the growing landslide threat.
- Percent susceptible area: 10.6%
- Total susceptible area: 64 square miles
- Percent susceptible area: 11.5%
- Total susceptible area: 164 square miles
- Percent susceptible area: 12.6%
- Total susceptible area: 175 square miles
- Percent susceptible area: 13.3%
- Total susceptible area: 132 square miles
- Percent susceptible area: 22.7%
- Total susceptible area: 444 square miles
- Percent susceptible area: 25.5%
- Total susceptible area: 1,065 square miles
- Percent susceptible area: 29.4%
- Total susceptible area: 232 square miles
- Percent susceptible area: 30.7%
- Total susceptible area: 313 square miles
- Percent susceptible area: 31.6%
- Total susceptible area: 1,245 square miles
- Percent susceptible area: 38.7%
- Total susceptible area: 7,763 square miles
- Percent susceptible area: 40.8%
- Total susceptible area: 613 square miles
- Percent susceptible area: 42.1%
- Total susceptible area: 484 square miles
- Percent susceptible area: 45.5%
- Total susceptible area: 3,707 square miles
- Percent susceptible area: 46.2%
- Total susceptible area: 2,103 square miles
- Percent susceptible area: 51.2%
- Total susceptible area: 3,688 square miles
- Percent susceptible area: 52.3%
- Total susceptible area: 332 square miles
- Percent susceptible area: 54.0%
- Total susceptible area: 3,226 square miles
- Percent susceptible area: 55.0%
- Total susceptible area: 724 square miles
- Percent susceptible area: 55.5%
- Total susceptible area: 911 square miles
- Percent susceptible area: 57.4%
- Total susceptible area: 1,229 square miles
- Percent susceptible area: 58.8%
- Total susceptible area: 2,404 square miles
- Percent susceptible area: 59.3%
- Total susceptible area: 29 square miles
- Percent susceptible area: 61.6%
- Total susceptible area: 457 square miles
- Percent susceptible area: 62.2%
- Total susceptible area: 6,337 square miles
- Percent susceptible area: 63.4%
- Total susceptible area: 506 square miles
- Percent susceptible area: 64.6%
- Total susceptible area: 3,121 square miles
- Percent susceptible area: 68.7%
- Total susceptible area: 2,092 square miles
- Percent susceptible area: 70.1%
- Total susceptible area: 502 square miles
- Percent susceptible area: 71.9%
- Total susceptible area: 2,731 square miles
- Percent susceptible area: 71.9%
- Total susceptible area: 4,518 square miles
- Percent susceptible area: 73.0%
- Total susceptible area: 2,161 square miles
- Percent susceptible area: 75.0%
- Total susceptible area: 1,056 square miles
- Percent susceptible area: 76.9%
- Total susceptible area: 985 square miles
- Percent susceptible area: 79.4%
- Total susceptible area: 354 square miles
- Percent susceptible area: 80.5%
- Total susceptible area: 2,662 square miles
- Percent susceptible area: 80.6%
- Total susceptible area: 1,273 square miles
- Percent susceptible area: 80.6%
- Total susceptible area: 2,055 square miles
- Percent susceptible area: 81.3%
- Total susceptible area: 2,684 square miles
- Percent susceptible area: 81.4%
- Total susceptible area: 606 square miles
- Percent susceptible area: 81.5%
- Total susceptible area: 3,459 square miles
- Percent susceptible area: 82.2%
- Total susceptible area: 1,522 square miles
- Percent susceptible area: 83.1%
- Total susceptible area: 495 square miles
- Percent susceptible area: 84.1%
- Total susceptible area: 2,307 square miles
- Percent susceptible area: 84.9%
- Total susceptible area: 455 square miles
- Percent susceptible area: 84.9%
- Total susceptible area: 810 square miles
- Percent susceptible area: 85.2%
- Total susceptible area: 1,183 square miles
- Percent susceptible area: 86.4%
- Total susceptible area: 386 square miles
- Percent susceptible area: 88.5%
- Total susceptible area: 851 square miles
- Percent susceptible area: 88.5%
- Total susceptible area: 1,515 square miles
- Percent susceptible area: 90.2%
- Total susceptible area: 915 square miles
- Percent susceptible area: 91.0%
- Total susceptible area: 1,322 square miles
- Percent susceptible area: 91.4%
- Total susceptible area: 676 square miles
- Percent susceptible area: 91.9%
- Total susceptible area: 928 square miles
- Percent susceptible area: 91.9%
- Total susceptible area: 2,054 square miles
- Percent susceptible area: 92.0%
- Total susceptible area: 1,156 square miles
- Percent susceptible area: 92.3%
- Total susceptible area: 3,329 square miles
- Percent susceptible area: 94.5%
- Total susceptible area: 3,318 square miles
- Percent susceptible area: 97.2%
- Total susceptible area: 3,095 square miles
This story features data reporting and writing by Paxtyn Merten and is part of a series utilizing data automation across 50 states.