Counties in Texas where landslides pose the greatest threat

In Texas, over half of the land is susceptible to landslides in 6 counties.
A landslide occurs when rock, debris, or earth moves down a slope. Inclines like hills and bluffs are a critical element of slides, meaning mountainous regions are at higher risk. Typically, landslides are triggered by forces like heavy rainfall, snowmelt, earthquakes, volcanic activity, human activities, or some combination of factors. Often, they're impossible to predict.
According to the Geological Survey, places where weak or fractured earth sit on steep slopes are likely to experience landslides—for example, areas with a history of strip mining. In Appalachia, about 1,400 square miles of land are scarred by strip mining within the Ohio River basin, according to an Inside Climate News analysis of satellite imagery. Together, the "waste rock" left behind, increasing stream flows, and heavy rainfalls brought on by climate change create a deadly recipe for landslides. This part of Appalachia is also near the Gulf of Mexico, where fast-warming waters stir up exceptionally fast-growing storms, as was the case with Hurricane Helene.
Combined, these elements create the highest vulnerability to landslides in the region. Much of West Virginia, in particular, is at risk: In 47 of the state's 55 counties, more than 90% of the land is susceptible to slides. Parts of Virginia, Kentucky, Ohio, Tennessee, and North Carolina are also exceedingly vulnerable.
Parts of California's coastline have also been plagued by major landslides. Earlier this year, a rockslide destroyed a part of Highway 1 along the state's famed Big Sur. The earth below the highway isn't sturdy, and wetter storms are further weakening it, contributing to more frequent and severe landslides. The majestic Big Sur stretch is an iconic road trip and tourism destination, where the highway winds along cliffs above the Pacific Ocean. However, it was forced to close to most traffic, and still offers just one lane at some points.
Other landslide risk factors include population growth, rapid land use changes, urbanization, heavy logging and deforestation, and inappropriate use of lands—slopes in particular. Wildfires also generate landslide hazards, leaving behind excess debris that can be dragged down during floods, as was the case in Big Sur.
The heightened frequency and severity of landslides are a direct consequence of logging, mining, and climate change, with massive repercussions for safety and critical infrastructure in the U.S. and around the world.
Hazard maps like those from the Geological Survey are a tool that federal, state, and local governments can use to identify landslide vulnerabilities and prepare for them. Preparation and mitigation efforts might include landslide drills, evacuation plans, improved drainage systems, and slope stabilization. Governments in susceptible areas can adopt disaster-resilient building codes and standards, as well as restrictions on mining and logging.
In some cases, such as Highway 1, there are no obvious solutions to fully protect against landslides. Still, with increased awareness and response plans, people can make more informed decisions on where to live (or safely visit) and can prepare themselves for landslides and their aftermath.
Read on to see where in Texas is most vulnerable to the growing landslide threat.

- Percent susceptible area: 26.6%
- Total susceptible area: 286 square miles

- Percent susceptible area: 26.8%
- Total susceptible area: 251 square miles

- Percent susceptible area: 28.0%
- Total susceptible area: 258 square miles

- Percent susceptible area: 29.3%
- Total susceptible area: 124 square miles

- Percent susceptible area: 29.3%
- Total susceptible area: 264 square miles

- Percent susceptible area: 29.4%
- Total susceptible area: 294 square miles

- Percent susceptible area: 30.2%
- Total susceptible area: 206 square miles

- Percent susceptible area: 30.3%
- Total susceptible area: 151 square miles

- Percent susceptible area: 30.6%
- Total susceptible area: 477 square miles

- Percent susceptible area: 30.7%
- Total susceptible area: 284 square miles

- Percent susceptible area: 30.9%
- Total susceptible area: 288 square miles

- Percent susceptible area: 31.2%
- Total susceptible area: 877 square miles

- Percent susceptible area: 31.5%
- Total susceptible area: 289 square miles

- Percent susceptible area: 31.6%
- Total susceptible area: 297 square miles

- Percent susceptible area: 31.7%
- Total susceptible area: 337 square miles

- Percent susceptible area: 31.8%
- Total susceptible area: 289 square miles

- Percent susceptible area: 31.9%
- Total susceptible area: 284 square miles

- Percent susceptible area: 31.9%
- Total susceptible area: 288 square miles

- Percent susceptible area: 32.5%
- Total susceptible area: 296 square miles

- Percent susceptible area: 33.0%
- Total susceptible area: 326 square miles

- Percent susceptible area: 33.6%
- Total susceptible area: 314 square miles

- Percent susceptible area: 33.9%
- Total susceptible area: 326 square miles

- Percent susceptible area: 34.0%
- Total susceptible area: 311 square miles

- Percent susceptible area: 34.1%
- Total susceptible area: 1,298 square miles
- Percent susceptible area: 35.0%
- Total susceptible area: 197 square miles

- Percent susceptible area: 35.0%
- Total susceptible area: 206 square miles

- Percent susceptible area: 35.0%
- Total susceptible area: 326 square miles

- Percent susceptible area: 35.4%
- Total susceptible area: 323 square miles

- Percent susceptible area: 35.4%
- Total susceptible area: 327 square miles

- Percent susceptible area: 36.1%
- Total susceptible area: 362 square miles

- Percent susceptible area: 36.1%
- Total susceptible area: 451 square miles

- Percent susceptible area: 36.5%
- Total susceptible area: 393 square miles
- Percent susceptible area: 36.6%
- Total susceptible area: 330 square miles

- Percent susceptible area: 36.7%
- Total susceptible area: 196 square miles

- Percent susceptible area: 36.9%
- Total susceptible area: 298 square miles

- Percent susceptible area: 38.0%
- Total susceptible area: 344 square miles

- Percent susceptible area: 38.6%
- Total susceptible area: 407 square miles

- Percent susceptible area: 38.7%
- Total susceptible area: 276 square miles

- Percent susceptible area: 39.3%
- Total susceptible area: 374 square miles

- Percent susceptible area: 42.5%
- Total susceptible area: 470 square miles

- Percent susceptible area: 43.7%
- Total susceptible area: 83 square miles

- Percent susceptible area: 45.4%
- Total susceptible area: 963 square miles

- Percent susceptible area: 48.0%
- Total susceptible area: 1,131 square miles

- Percent susceptible area: 49.0%
- Total susceptible area: 1,886 square miles

- Percent susceptible area: 51.2%
- Total susceptible area: 1,159 square miles

- Percent susceptible area: 52.0%
- Total susceptible area: 3,213 square miles

- Percent susceptible area: 52.6%
- Total susceptible area: 349 square miles

- Percent susceptible area: 53.9%
- Total susceptible area: 1,717 square miles

- Percent susceptible area: 63.8%
- Total susceptible area: 507 square miles

- Percent susceptible area: 67.8%
- Total susceptible area: 475 square miles
This story features data reporting and writing by Paxtyn Merten and is part of a series utilizing data automation across 50 states.